Why GTM in Construction Tech Fails—Even With a Great Product
In construction tech, having a great product doesn't guarantee market traction. I say this as someone sitting in the CRO seat at a construction analytics company—where we live the tension between building for the field and selling to the office. If you don't understand the nuance of construction sales cycles, industry trust dynamics, and how to align pricing with real-world pain, even the most advanced product will stall. This failure isn't about weak technology. It's about missing the mark on go-to-market (GTM).
June 13, 2025
What Makes ConTech GTM So Challenging?
18
Month Sales Cycles
Unlike typical SaaS with 30-60 day cycles
2
Buyer-User Gap
Field users vs. executive buyers
5
Key Challenges
Unique to construction technology
1
Sales Cycles Are Longer Than SaaS Norms
Unlike typical SaaS where a 30- or 60-day sales cycle is expected, in ConTech you're often looking at 6 to 18 months. Stakeholders are cautious. Purchasing requires alignment across finance, operations, and field leaders. This reality alone demands a restructured GTM model. CEMEX Ventures notes that construction has one of the slowest tech adoption curves due to risk-aversion and low digitization maturity. [CEMEX Ventures Q1 2025 Report]
2
The Buyer Isn't Always the User
You may be solving a field problem, but your buyer is a CFO or VP of Ops who needs to justify ROI in terms of backlog, cash flow, or margin. That means your GTM must speak finance fluently—not just UX.
3
Relationship Selling Still Dominates
ConTech is a high-trust industry. Even with dashboards and integrations, buyers still ask, "Who else is using this?" and "What do you do if it breaks?" According to the Construction Innovation Journal, peer recommendations and industry partnerships weigh heavily on GTM traction.
4
Product-Led Growth Rarely Works
Self-serve demos and trial onboarding don't land well in an industry with fragmented tech stacks and limited time. GTM must be consultative, even if the product is intuitive. If your GTM relies solely on digital touchpoints, you'll burn leads before they convert.
5
Misaligned Pricing Models
Usage-based or per-seat pricing rarely works unless it maps directly to job size or bid volume. GTM leaders need to think more like contractors—budget cycles, sunk costs, and how procurement decisions flow.
What Actually Works?
Segment by Decision-Maker, Not Just Company Size
Target finance, operations, and preconstruction roles differently.
Education-Based GTM
Thought leadership matters more than product demos. (Case in point: this blog.)
Hybrid Sales Motions
Blend field-focused onboarding with C-suite-level performance metrics.
Trust First, Tech Second
Co-brand with known industry players, partner with trusted advisory groups like CFMA or AGC.
From My Seat as CRO
At ContractorBI, I've had to reshape our GTM to align with how contractors actually buy. We don't just sell dashboards; we offer decision intelligence tailored to financial workflows. But that only became clear after engaging directly with our customers' growth blockers—missed bid deadlines, low win rates, cash flow blind spots.
GTM isn't just about messaging. It's about listening, realigning, and building systems that can carry your product over the long construction sales cycle.
Final Takeaway
In ConTech, go-to-market is not a sprint. It's a trust marathon. Even the most innovative tech can fail if it doesn't respect the pace and politics of this industry. Build your GTM from a place of lived empathy, not software orthodoxy. Your product deserves to scale—just make sure your GTM is built to carry it.
Enjoyed this insight?
Subscribe to Mind Expanding Ideas for exclusive thought leadership, deep dives, and early access to new content.
Join a growing community of ConTech leaders and innovators shaping the future.